Week 6: Biotech + Art

 Biotech + Art

The tools of biotechnology are used to improve lives through innovative solutions to previously impossible problems such using genetic modifications to treat diseases and create more resilient crops. There has also been an increase in the use of biotechnology in art to create semi-living organisms and alter living organisms for aesthetics. Artists use a variety of unique canvases to display their work. However, using living being as a live canvas brings up many ethical concerns of how far their artistic license stretches.

Consider the following example, Eduardo Kac's fluorescent bunny Alba was genetically modified using GFP to glow green when exposed to blue light. He states his piece has gone from being controversial to iconic (Kac 119). The consequently inspired "GloFish" is fish that also fluoresce, and was produced to be sold as commercial pets, which is now available in 4 species and 6 colors (Levy 9). 

These projects edit the genetics of the organisms to include fluorescent genes so they glow in the dark. This makes for their aesthetic application in art exhibitions or even fish tanks in your basement. However, interfering with an organisms' genetics, especially when the implications for future generations is unknown, is not only frivolous but also dangerous. I, thus, agree with Levy's statement that such displays of art serve as examples of, "trivial use(s) of genetic engineering" (9). 

Eduardo Kac and Alba



GloFish

Marta de Menezes tackles this careless alteration of life in her work "Nature?" in which she alters the wings of live butterflies as they develop, creating an intersection between their natural beauty and her art. Since no genes are modified, these changes are not transmitted through generations. Her work explores the important questions of where nature is no longer natural given human intervention. It also brings up the impossible question of whether any manipulation to animals and insects can be justified if only for artistic purpose? Can the costs ever outweigh the benefits?

Marta de Menezes: Nature?

BioArt is a unique and contemporary field that uses biotechnology to explore and emphasize biological and artistic interconnectedness to each other and nature. However, editing genes, interfering with developmental processes, and adding artificial characteristics to animals and insects for the purposes of aesthetic pleasure cannot be justified for me, personally. I do, however, look forward to further explore the ethical boundaries that I am comfortable with and the restrictions the artistic and scientific communities eventually agree on.


Works Cited

Kac, Eduardo. “GFP Bunny at 20.” Journal of Posthuman Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, 2020, pp. 119–128, https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.4.2.0119.

Levy, Ellen K.. “Defining Life. Artists Challenge Conventional Classifications.” 5 May 2023, UCLA, Bruinlearn. 

de Menezes, Marta. “Nature?” Marta de Menezes, 2000, martademenezes.com/art/nature/nature/.

Stracey, Frances. “Bio-Art: The Ethics behind the Aesthetics.” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 7, 2009, pp. 496–500, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2699.

Vesna, Victoria. "BioArt" DESMA 9, 5 May 2023, UCLA, Bruinlearn

Images/Videos Cited

Kac, Eduardo. “GFP Bunny – Noema – Technology & Society.” NOEMA, noemalab.eu/ideas/gfp-bunny/. Accessed 8 May 2023.

UC Davis. “Glofish-Fluorescent-Fish-Group-Photo-with-New-Striped-Green-Barb.Jpg.” Biobeef Blog, 14 Oct. 2021, biobeef.faculty.ucdavis.edu/2021/10/14/public-acceptance-of-animal-genomics-and-biotechnology/glofish-fluorescent-fish-group-photo-with-new-striped-green-barb-3/.

“Marta de Menezes, Creating Artworks That Live and Die.” CLOT Magazine, 5 Apr. 2016, clotmag.com/biomedia/marta-de-menezes-creating-artworks-that-live-and-die#:~:text=In%20Nature%3F%2C%20Menezes%20induced%20a,not%20transmitted%20to%20the%20offspring.

Comments

  1. Emily SunMay 11, 2023 at 11:23 PM

    Hey Anouska, I really enjoyed reading your blog post! I liked your exploration of the ethical boundaries of using life as a medium for art, especially your examples that discuss artificial fluorescence into organisms like Alba and the GloFish. I also agree that altering an organisms genetic make up or natural developmental process to use as an artistic canvas ultimately cannot be justified solely by providing aesthetic value to human observers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 8: Nanotech + Art

Image
Nanotech + Art Nanotechnology studies and manipulates materials in the nanoscale. It was discussed by Richard Feynman in "There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom" in which he highlighted the "enormous potential" for development in the field of nanosciences (Feynman 1). Since then, we have seen this potential be explored in many disciplines including developments in semiconductors, dyes and pigments, and nanomedicine. Many of these advances have depended on novel approaches to design and manipulate nanostructures, making the involvement of art in the field indispensable.  It is hard to believe what you can't see. The nanoscale is impossible to see, but can be imaged using Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) created by Binnig and Rohrer in 1981 (Chen 573). STM uses a sharp probe close to the surface of the specimen being imaged, and uses electron interactions between the tip and the specimen surface to scan it. This produces a grayscale image which is converted t...
Read more

Week 3: Robotics + Art

Image
Robotics and Art The development of machines from the development of the printing press, has been a topic of marvel but also an issue of debate across disciplines. It played a large role in industrialization and the automation of many labor-intensive tasks in factories. Today, improvements in technology includes artificial intelligence that can produce original material and robots that look human, and the progress is yet to down. However, the initial hesitancy against robotics persists. The Industrial Revolution One of the most important early arguments made against automation was in 1936 by Walter Benjamin. He argued that the authenticity or "aura" of art is depleted by mechanical reproduction. Many people believe creativity in children is hindered by tablets, TVs, and computers. However, by 1995 Douglas Davis contradicted the loss of authenticity that Benjamin described. Davis suggests, instead that the "aura" had been stretched to allow transmission of informatio...
Read more

Event 3: LASER: Decolonizing AI

Image
LASER: De-colonizing AI On Thursday, June 1st, I attended a LASER Talks event on "Decolonizing AI". The Leonardo/ISAST LASER Talks program brings together people from various disciplines including art and science to give informal presentations about their work and "encourage contribution to the cultural environment of a region". The talk focused on the western-centric development of AI and the potential for machines to inherit the same imperialism and colonialism present in many fields, even today. Amir Baradaran is an augmented reality (AR)tist that discussed the impact of AI on the ecosystem, and more specifically, the art ecosystem. He cautioned about AI becoming the art or the artist but also encouraged the use of AI to help create and innovate.  The talk I was most intrigued by, however, was by the Armenian writer and artist Mashinka Firunts Hakopian, who discussed the inheritance of historically discriminatory and euro-centric views by artificial intelligence....
Read more